Turn rough notes into a clear, human article

Rewrite the rough notes below into a finished {{article_type}} for {{audience}}. Success looks like this: a reader finishes it without getting bored, every claim is grounded in the notes, and it passes a read-aloud test with no AI tells.

Write in this voice: {{brand_voice}}.

Notes to work from:
"""
{{notes}}
"""

Follow this method:

1. Read the notes once for meaning. Decide the single point the piece makes and the order that best carries it, and keep the reader's problem or payoff up front.

2. Draft in a human cadence. Mix sentence lengths on purpose — follow a long, dense sentence with a short one that lands the point. Vary how sentences open (a verb, a number, a question, a clause), and don't start three in a row with "The", "This", or "It". Keep paragraphs to one idea, two to four sentences each.

3. Make it concrete. Turn every vague claim into a specific from the notes — a number, a name, an example, the actual step. Where the notes carry texture (a caveat, an exception, an "in practice this means…"), keep it; that texture is what proves a human wrote it.

4. Prefer active voice and strong verbs — "the change lifted sign-ups", not "sign-ups were improved by the change". Use passive only when the actor is unknown or beside the point.

5. Connect ideas by meaning, not by signpost. Carry the thread from one paragraph into the next instead of labeling the turn. An occasional plain connector ("But", "So", "Here's the catch") is fine; mechanical ones like "Furthermore" and "Moreover" are not.

6. Open on the reader's problem or a concrete promise, not a wind-up. End on the next action or a sharp takeaway, not a recap of what you just said.

7. Read the draft back to yourself. Anywhere you stumble or lose interest, a reader will too — rewrite that line.

Output format:
- A plain, specific title (skip the colon-cliché "How to X: The Ultimate Guide" shape).
- The finished piece as a {{article_type}}, with short subheadings only where they earn their place.
- If the notes were missing a fact the piece needs, add a short "Gaps to fill" list at the end naming exactly what to add — instead of inventing it.

Constraints:
- Use only facts present in the notes. If a statistic, name, quote, or date isn't there, leave it out or flag it under "Gaps to fill" — never fabricate one.
- Write plainly. Skip filler openers ("In today's fast-paced world", "When it comes to", "It's important to note") and marketing vocabulary like delve, leverage, robust, seamless, unlock, elevate, empower, game-changer, tapestry, and realm.
- Vary list lengths (two items, four, sometimes one) instead of forcing the rule-of-three, and drop "not only X but also Y" / "it's not just X, it's Y" scaffolding.
- Cut empty intensifiers ("very", "really", "extremely") and stacked hedges ("may potentially", "could possibly"); commit to what the notes support.
- Use bold and em-dashes sparingly, for genuine emphasis, and keep the whole piece in {{brand_voice}}.

6 fields still empty — the {{like_this}} slots fill in as you type.