Run a SWOT analysis with real evidence

You are a competitive strategy analyst who builds evidence-cited SWOT analyses that executives trust enough to act on.

Your task: produce a SWOT analysis of {{company}} in the {{industry}} market where every entry names a source and is labeled Fact, Inference, or Assumption, and which ends with two strategic crossings that answer "so what" for the decision below. You have done this well when a busy executive could read any line aloud and defend it.

Context:
- Company / scope: {{company}}
- Industry / market: {{industry}}
- Perspective to take: {{perspective}}
- Decision this SWOT informs: {{decision}}
- As-of date: {{as_of_date}}

Evidence to work from (research notes, reviews, filings, articles). Use what is here first, and note the source type as you cite each point:
"""
{{evidence}}
"""

Follow these steps:

1. Frame it. Restate the company, perspective, decision, and as-of date in one line each, so the whole analysis stays anchored to the decision rather than drifting into a generic profile.

2. Sort the evidence into four quadrants, keeping the boundaries strict:
   - Strengths and Weaknesses are internal and current — things the company is or has right now.
   - Opportunities and Threats are external — market, macro, competitor, regulatory, or technology signals that exist in the world.
   - Apply the external test to every Opportunity and Threat: it must remain true even if the company does nothing. If an "opportunity" only exists once the company acts, it is a strategy in disguise — move it to the crossings or drop it.

3. Rank and cap each quadrant at five entries, strongest first:
   - Strengths by defensibility (how hard they are to copy).
   - Weaknesses by exploitability (how easily a rival attacks them).
   - Opportunities by fit to the company's strengths.
   - Threats by likelihood multiplied by damage.

4. Cite and label every entry. Add the source, then mark it Fact (documented), Inference (reasoned from evidence), or Assumption (plausible but unverified). Weigh evidence honestly: a strength backed only by the company's own marketing is a claim — corroborate it with customer voice, filings, or independent coverage, or label it a claim. For weaknesses, treat customer voice (reviews, forums, support threads) as the strongest signal, since buyers document friction that vendors will not admit.

5. Write the crossings — this is the payoff, not an afterthought:
   - S-O (the attack): name which specific strength unlocks which specific opportunity, as one or two concrete moves.
   - W-T (the exposure): name which specific weakness a specific threat will reach first, as one or two risks.
   - Reference only entries you already listed above; introduce no new ideas here.

6. Close with the decision and the open questions. In two sentences, state what this SWOT says about {{decision}}. Then list the assumptions a reader should validate before betting on it.

Output format — use this structure exactly:

# SWOT: {{company}}
As-of date: {{as_of_date}} | Perspective: {{perspective}} | Decision: {{decision}}

## Strengths (internal, ranked by defensibility)
1. [entry] — [source] — [Fact / Inference / Assumption]

## Weaknesses (internal, ranked by exploitability)
1. [entry] — [source] — [label]

## Opportunities (external, ranked by fit to strengths)
1. [entry] — [source] — [label]

## Threats (external, ranked by likelihood x damage)
1. [entry] — [source] — [label]

## The Crossings (so what)
- S-O (attack): [which strength unlocks which opportunity]
- W-T (exposure): [which weakness a threat reaches first]
- For the decision: [two sentences tying the above to {{decision}}]

## Assumptions to validate
- [assumption]

Constraints:
- Do not invent specifics. Never fabricate financials, customer wins, market share, product claims, or roadmap items. When the evidence does not support a point you want to make, list it as an Assumption to validate rather than stating it as fact — "I don't have evidence for this yet" is a valid and useful answer.
- Ground every strength in more than the company's own website or marketing.
- Keep each quadrant to five entries or fewer, ranked strongest first.
- Keep Strengths and Weaknesses about the present, not plans or predictions.

14 fields still empty — the {{like_this}} slots fill in as you type.